![]() ![]() If you are sufficiently concerned you could either rewrite the logbook unless it contains certified entries, or simply make a notice of correction in it, or just leave it alone and carry on in future with correct entries. I have always relied on the CAA's pilots logbook issued by Her Majesty's Stationary office, and nobody has ever raised an eyebrow over it. I appreciate there are a whole host of logbooks and software programmes these days. Again, the distinction may be a remark entry if you feel it is relevant. Similarly with PM and PF unless your logbook allows for the distinction, there is normally a column for holders operating capacity (P1/P2/Dual) You can be P1 (pilot in command) and operating as either PF or PNF. Full-featured logbook without the bulk of 'professional' logs. ![]() ![]() Eases the burden of record-keeping for pilots and instructors. In none of my 9 logbooks is there any column to record take offs or landings although you could add it in the remarks column if you felt it was relevant. Practical for all pilot skill levels, student through professional. Obviously each sector started and finished with one of each and I always assumed the relevant authorities would also make that assumption. The same text thickness is used throughout. I Don't think in Nigh on 25,000 hours I have ever logged a take off or a landing. The easiest way to make your logbook look professional is to use the same pen throughout. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |